Tony McHale standing in his garden, smiling.

Help every man with prostate cancer

Give the gift of research to help every man with prostate cancer live longer, healthier lives.

Donate now

Tony McHale (pictured above) discovered he had an alteration in the BRCA2 gene at the age of 61, putting him at a much higher risk of developing prostate cancer. Shortly after, Tony joined the IMPACT study at the ICR, which investigated whether regular screening would lead to earlier diagnosis of aggressive forms of the disease. Around 18 months later, the screening revealed Tony had prostate cancer. 

"Being involved in the IMPACT study saved my life. If I hadn't taken part, I'd never have known I had prostate cancer. As far as I was aware, I didn't have any symptoms – and the sooner the disease is detected and treated, the better the chances are of survival." – Tony

Godfrey's prostate cancer story

 

DJ and music promoter, Godfrey Fletcher, found out he had prostate cancer in 2015 at the age of 47, shortly after his father had also been diagnosed.

"I was so lucky that my cancer was picked up at a very early stage. I was young and fit, with no symptoms. A year after my treatment finished, I was told it had been successful. My dad wasn't so fortunate. He was diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer and passed away at 80. His experience, and mine, showed me the importance of early diagnosis."

Why we need more research into prostate cancer

We're proud of the research advances we've made over the last 20 years. Our scientists discovered the drug abiraterone; identified genetic variants that influence risk of developing the disease; and pioneered new, more precise forms of radiotherapy. But despite our research advances, some prostate cancers remain difficult to treat. This includes those diagnosed at a later stage and those more aggressive tumours, which can spread quickly and evolve to resist treatment.

That's why we urgently need better ways to detect prostate cancer earlier, predict drug resistance, and develop smarter, more personalised treatments. Your gift will help our world-leading researchers unravel the complexity of prostate cancer, to give men precise and personalised care with the right treatments at the right time, to live longer and healthier lives.

Professor Eeles's goal is to develop new tests that could be used in prostate cancer screening, helping to identify men at a higher risk. Her team showed that a simple saliva test, carried out at home, was more accurate at identifying future risk of prostate cancer for some men than the current standard blood test. 

Building on this success, they recently launched a major new study to find out whether an improved version of this test – now suitable for more diverse groups, including Black men and younger men – can help detect more cancers earlier in men at higher risk. 

Tackling drug resistance

Our research underpinned the development of olaparib, a drug that revolutionised treatment for people with BRCA-related cancers. In a recent study, Professor Johann de Bono's team showed that changes which can be spotted with a simple blood test can reveal how long a prostate cancer patient will respond to olaparib. 

The ability to predict when – and how – patients will stop responding to olaparib could help doctors personalise treatment, and in the future, guide the development of new drugs to outsmart resistance – keeping us one step ahead of prostate cancer.

Professor Johann de Bono in the laboratory, smiling.

Creating smarter, kinder treatments for every man

Our scientists are at the forefront of precision cancer medicine – developing more effective treatments with fewer side effects.

Laboratory studies co-led by Dr Adam Sharp and Professor Johann de Bono showed that NXP800 – a new drug which targets a ‘master switch’ that cancer cells hijack to support their growth – slowed prostate cancer cell growth. This innovative drug could potentially also benefit men with advanced prostate cancer that has stopped responding to standard hormone therapy.

A study co-led by Professor Emma Hall has found that men with intermediate-risk, localised prostate cancer can be treated just as effectively with five sessions of higher-dose radiation therapy as with several weeks of standard treatment. Using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which targets tumours with pinpoint accuracy, patients can receive a highly effective treatment with far fewer hospital visits. 

A study co-led by Professor Nick James has shown that a new artificial intelligence (AI) test can select which men with high-risk prostate cancer that has not spread will require the life-extending drug abiraterone. In the STAMPEDE trial, the team found that three out of four men could be spared unnecessary treatment, making the drug – discovered by our scientists – more affordable for the NHS.

Your gift can help every man with prostate cancer live longer, healthier lives

Help someone's dad, grandad, brother, uncle, partner, or friend survive prostate cancer. Your support will help fund life-saving research – so that every man can spend more precious time with their loved ones.

Make a donation

Your gift of research can help transform the lives of every man with prostate cancer.
With GiftAid you'll also be able to add 25% at no extra cost to you

Please choose a donation amount.

Your gift of research can help transform the lives of every man with prostate cancer.
With GiftAid you'll also be able to add 25% at no extra cost to you

Please choose a donation amount.

 Related news and blogs

23/12/20 - by

When I was 68, I went on a safari holiday in Namibia. My wife and I were bouncing around in the back of a Land Rover for two weeks and I felt a soreness on my nipple. I thought it was just the seatbelt rubbing against it so I didn’t take much notice.

But I was still sore a month or so after we got back, and then I felt a small lump.

I knew men could get breast cancer, but I thought the likelihood of me having it was so low that I didn’t do anything about it. It wasn’t until a few months later when my wife playfully slapped me on the chest and felt the lump, which had grown substantially larger by this point, that I visited the GP.

My GP didn’t think it was anything to worry about either, but he referred me to the hospital just in case, and a biopsy then confirmed I had stage 3 breast cancer.

I was treated pretty quickly. Just two weeks after my diagnosis, I’d had a mastectomy, and then I went on to have chemotherapy and a lymph node clearance, followed by radiotherapy.

We have now completed work on our new state-of-the-art drug discovery centre to create more and better drugs for cancer patients. Here, we aim to develop a new generation of drugs that will make the difference to the lives of millions of people with cancer. Help us get research in the building off to the strongest possible start:

Donate now

Going for genetic testing

With all the treatment over, I was getting back on the road to fitness and starting to move on, but it was then recommended I go for genetic testing.

Although we didn’t know anything further back in the family history, my sister had recently had breast cancer and so the team in the breast clinic, and the nurse in particular, were very keen for me to get checked out.

The nurse explained what it all meant, and I thought it would be a good thing to do. I had the test and, when the results came back, they showed I had the BRCA2 mutation.

I called my sister straightaway, and she immediately decided to get tested.

The BRCA2 gene was discovered by scientists at the ICR in the 1990s and found to increase the risk of prostate and ovarian cancer, as well as breast cancer in both men and women.

My sister and her daughter have now both tested positive for the BRCA2 mutation, and my niece has chosen to get a double mastectomy as a preventative measure, which I think is incredibly brave of her.

Tony and Brenda on a walk

When I got my test results back, it was explained to me that I was now at an increased risk of developing prostate cancer, and my consultant encouraged me to join the IMPACT study, which offers regular screening to men carrying mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 or the Lynch Syndrome genes MSH2, MSH6 or MLH1.

Since joining the study, I’ve been going for annual PSA checks, and just over two years ago it was discovered my PSA had gone up to 3.8, whereas normally it was 2.4.

Our scientists are renowned for their success in improving treatments for men with prostate cancer. Our wide-ranging programme of research has delivered huge benefits for patients – helping men to live longer, improving their quality of life and increasing cure rates. Learn more about the latest updates on our prostate cancer research:

Find out more 

Being diagnosed with prostate cancer

The result wasn’t that high but, because I was on the IMPACT study, I was referred straightaway – and I then got a diagnosis of prostate cancer.

I’ve since had 37 sessions of radiotherapy for my prostate cancer and am now on the hormone therapy goserelin, which I’ll have every 12 weeks for the next three years.

Being told I had the BRCA2 mutation effectively saved my life. I don’t think a PSA of 3.8 would have been enough for my GP to have referred me, and the prostate cancer could have been too far gone by the time it showed itself in symptoms.

I feel pretty lucky. Thanks to discovering I had the BRCA2 mutation, my prostate cancer was caught early, and I was able to receive the treatment I needed and get straight back to my normal life.

At the start of this year, my wife and I were travelling around New Zealand. The outbreak of coronavirus has obviously put a stop to any further travels since then, but we’re already planning our next adventures together and I’m looking forward to carry on living the life I want with her by my side.

Our researchers identified the BRCA2 gene, which enabled families with a history of cancer to be assessed for future risk, and laid the groundwork for developing novel forms of therapy for BRCA-associated cancers. Learn more about our work related to BRCA genes:

Find out more