Centre for In Vivo Modelling Service Core

At the Centre for In Vivo Modelling (CIVM), we combine advanced animal genetics and cutting-edge technologies to drive cancer research. Our multidisciplinary team specialises in the generation and maintenance of genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), humanised mouse strains, and patient-derived models (xenografts and organoids), using innovations such as CRISPR gene editing, embryo manipulation, and in vivo genetic screening. We develop and cryopreserve new cancer models that closely replicate human disease, supporting translational studies that inform effective therapies. Our approach integrates rigorous scientific standards, ethical oversight, and collaborative expertise, aiming to accelerate progress in understanding cancer biology and developing better treatments for patients.

Our Centre is dedicated to driving innovation and excellence in cancer research through advanced in vivo modelling. We work in close collaboration with the ICR researchers and clinicians at The Royal Marsden to generate genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) and patient-derived models, such as patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and patient-derived organoids (PDOs) to interrogate cancer biology in its own ecosystem. By leveraging these sophisticated in vivo systems, the Centre aims to:

  • Develop innovative cancer models in collaboration with ICR researchers to advance cancer research and drug discovery.
  • Work in partnership with The Royal Marsden Hospital to obtain patient samples and generate new patient-derived cancer models for translational studies.
  • Foster close interdisciplinary collaboration with drug discovery teams to leverage these in vivo models in the creation and testing of next-generation anti-cancer therapies.
  • Continuously improve the sophistication and relevance of our cancer models, ensuring they more faithfully recapitulate the complexity of human disease and enhance the translational impact of our research.

 

Our services

Advantages of cryopreserving your strains:

  • Allows you to save space, by getting the mice you need, when you need;
  • Reduces your animal costs;
  • Reduces animal use;
  • Reduces risk from disasters (e.g. disease outbreaks, breeding cessation, equipment failures, genetic contamination, natural disasters, etc…).

 What can be cryopreserved?

  • Mouse Sperm
  • Mouse Embryos
  • Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
  • Mouse Oocytes

 Sperm Cryopreservation:

Description: Sperm is retrieved from the epididymal tissues of 3 male mice and is cryopreserved in 20 to 30 straws that are stored in liquid-phase, liquid nitrogen across two tanks in two separate locations (SRD and CCDD), to ensure sample safety and mitigate risks associated to unexpected or uncontrollable events.

Material needed: 3 males, reproductively active, 12-25 weeks old

Timeline: 2-6 weeks (dependant on QC method of choice)

Considerations: this method of cryopreservation is rapid and cheap; however, it only preserves half of the genome. This method is only recommended for single mutations on a common inbred background.

Quality Control: we provide different levels of Quality Control (QC) for different price ranges.

  1. Test thaw QC: we will thaw 1 straw the day after cryopreservation and visually assess motility and viability of the recovered sperm
  2. IVF and culture to blastocyst QC: we highly recommend this QC step. In addition to test thaw, we will also perform IVF and culture embryos up to blastocyst stage. We will provide the investigator with a fertility rate (%) for the recovered sperm. We will charge an extra cost to cover the IVF procedure.
  3. IVF and embryo transfer QC: In addition to test thaw, we will perform IVF and transfer 2-cell embryos into up to 3 pseudopregnant females to generate viable embryos/live pups. We will charge an extra cost to cover the IVF and embryo transfer procedures.

    Please note that we require you to provide your genotyping protocol, as well as full detail of the genetic content of each strain that you submit for cryopreservation.

Diagram of Sperm Cryopreservation

Embryo Cryopreservation:

Description: Female mice are hormonally superovulated and oocytes are retrieved for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with sperm from donor male. Resulting embryos are placed in cryoprotectant and loaded into multiple straws, which are gradually cooled and stored in liquid-phase liquid nitrogen in two separate tanks.

Material needed: Donor male and 8-10 donor females

Timeline: 12-15 weeks

Diagram of Embryo Cryopreservation

Embryonic Stem Cells Cryopreservation:

Not available, yet.

Oocyte Cryopreservation:

Not available, yet.

Cryostorage:

If you have cryopreserved mouse sperm/embryo/oocytes at another institution, we can cryostorage your samples for an annual fee. We do require that the investigator takes charge of shipping costs into our facility, and that thawing and genotyping protocols are submitted to the CIVM.

The CIVM stores all samples in liquid-phase liquid nitrogen tanks (CryoPlus1, ThermoFisher Scientific). Material retrieved from each strain is split between 2 tanks, a main and a backup tank, for redundancy. For additional safety, these 2 tanks are located in two separate buildings at ICR Sutton. Both tanks are continuously monitored by T-scan alarm systems and undergo annual service, as well as daily visual inspections.


 

Sperm Cryorecovery:

Description: Frozen sperm is cryorecovered by IVF, followed by embryo transfer. We can purchase wild-type female oocyte donors of the same genetic background, or alternatively the investigator can provide homozygous oocyte donors of the same strain.

Material needed: straw with frozen sperm and 8 to 12 females for IVF, 7-16 weeks old.

Timeline: 12-15 weeks

Diagram of Sperm Cryorecovery

 

Embryo Cryorecovery:

Description: Frozen 2-cell embryos are thawed and transferred into pseudopregnant females.

Material needed: straw(s) with frozen 2-cell embryos

Timeline: 8-10 week


Oocyte Cryorecovery:

Not available, yet.

 

Mouse rederivation

Description: Mouse rederivation is a process used to produce pathogen-free mouse colonies by removing microbial contaminants from existing lines. The procedure can be performed either through natural mating or in vitro fertilization (IVF):

  • In natural mating, embryos are obtained from donor mice and transferred into pathogen-free recipient females.
  • In IVF-based rederivation, fertilized embryos are created in vitro using gametes from donor mice and then implanted into clean recipient females.

Both methods effectively eliminate pathogens, allowing safe importation of mouse strains from lower health-status facilities into the ICR BSU. Samples from both litter and recipient mother will be sent for Health Screening and the associated costs will be charged separately to the Investigator.

Material needed: For IVF-based rederivation we require the investigator to provide 2 males, reproductively active, 12-25 weeks old, and the CIVM will purchase wild-type female egg-donors. Alternatively, if maintaining homozygosity is essential, the investigator will need to provide additional 6-10 females, 7-16 weeks old.

Timeline: 12-15 week

Mouse Rederivation Mating Diagram

Mouse Rederivation IVF diagram

We are currently setting up CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing protocols. Soon, you’ll be able to apply for projects that involve developing new alleles based on:

  • Knockout by indel formation
  • Knockout by precise deletion
  • Conditional knockout
  • Knock-in of point mutations
  • Knock-in of small tags
  • Large knock-in
  • Exon replacement

These alleles will be developed based on Electroporation of Microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 system reagents.

We will collaborate with you to design the best strategy and help you generate the genetically engineered mice you need for your project. 

We also provide:

  • Development of humanised mouse strains
  • Development of Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and organoid models

Latest ICR News

19/06/26

Scientists have uncovered a mechanism that helps cancer cells survive radiation, pointing to a potential new way to make treatment more effective. The study revealed that a protein long associated with cell growth also plays a critical role in repairing DNA damage caused by radiotherapy.

The researchers found that when insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) is lost or blocked, cancer cells become less able to repair the most significant form of DNA damage: double-strand breaks. IGF-1R appears to help recruit a key repair protein to the site of damage on chromatin, the tightly packed structure that organises DNA in cells. Without this recruitment, the repair process – known as end-joining – becomes defective, leaving cells vulnerable and easier to destroy.

In the longer term, the study could help inform new treatment strategies that combine radiotherapy with drugs designed to weaken a tumour’s ability to repair DNA. The findings of the research, which was led by scientists at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and the University of Oxford, were published in the journal Molecular Oncology. Funding was provided by Cancer Research UK, the Medical Research Council and Prostate Cancer UK.

From growth signal to DNA repair partner

Radiotherapy works by damaging the DNA inside cancer cells, creating breaks that, if left unrepaired, ultimately lead to cell death. However, many cancers develop ways to fix this damage, allowing them to survive and continue growing. Understanding these repair systems is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. The new findings suggest that one such system depends on IGF-1R.

IGF-1R is a receptor found on the surface of many cells. It is activated by growth factors and helps regulate processes such as cell division and survival. In cancer, this signalling pathway is often overactive, promoting tumour progression. Because of this, IGF-1R has already been studied as a drug target, albeit with mixed results.

The new research adds an important layer to this picture. Rather than simply helping cancer cells grow, IGF-1R appears to be directly involved in how they respond to damage. Specifically, it influences whether DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) can access chromatin and carry out the repairs needed to maintain the cell’s integrity.

DNA-PKcs is essential for non-homologous end joining, one of the main mechanisms that cells use to repair double-strand breaks. If this process is disrupted, DNA damage accumulates, increasing the likelihood that the cell will die – precisely the outcome clinicians hope to achieve when delivering radiotherapy.

By showing that IGF-1R loss interferes with DNA-PKcs recruitment, the study highlights a previously unknown connection between growth signalling and DNA repair machinery.

Implications for future cancer therapies

In the short term, the findings are expected to guide further research. Scientists now have a clearer lead to explore when investigating why certain cancers resist radiotherapy. The work also raises the possibility that drugs targeting IGF-1R could be repurposed or refined to enhance the effectiveness of radiation treatment.

The ultimate aim is to use the new information to create more effective combination treatments. By both damaging the cancer cells and attacking their repair mechanisms, such approaches could improve outcomes for patients whose cancers are currently difficult to treat.

There is particular interest in how this might apply to prostate cancer, where radiotherapy is commonly used. A subset of patients may benefit from therapies that exploit this newly recognised vulnerability, although further research will be needed to accurately identify those patients.

Before any clinical impact can be realised, scientists must validate the findings in more complex models that better mimic real tumours. They will also need to identify which cancer types rely most heavily on IGF-1R for DNA repair. Should these steps prove successful, the next phase would involve carefully designed clinical trials to test combination treatments in selected patient groups.

Although it is too early to estimate how many patients could ultimately benefit, the potential reach could extend beyond a single cancer type. Tumours that develop resistance to other DNA repair–targeting drugs might also be susceptible to strategies that interfere with IGF-1R.

A step towards overcoming treatment resistance

Treatment resistance remains one of the biggest challenges in oncology. Even when therapies initially succeed, many cancers find ways to adapt and survive. By uncovering a new piece of this puzzle, the current study offers a fresh direction for tackling the problem.

Corresponding author Professor Wojciech Niedzwiedz, Group Leader of the Cancer and Genome Instability Group at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), said:

“This discovery changes how we think about IGF-1R. Previously, it was primarily viewed as a driver of cancer growth. While that role remains important, our work suggests that it also acts as part of a cellular defence mechanism against treatment.

“What began as an investigation into a well-known growth receptor ended up revealing a critical link between signalling and cancer cell survival under treatment stress.”

First author Dr Matthew Ellis, who was working in Professor Niedzwiedz’s lab at the time of the study and is now a Research Associate in the Balmus Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, said:

“We knew that IGF-1R was linked to cancer cell survival and resistance to treatment, but it was striking to see how clearly it affected the cell’s ability to endure radiation-induced DNA damage. The effect of IGF-1R loss on DNA repair was very pronounced.

“As research continues, our hope is that insights like these will translate into more precise and effective treatments. By targeting the hidden support systems that cancer cells rely on, we may be able to tip the balance in favour of therapies like radiotherapy – making these tools even more powerful in the fight against cancer.”

The study is dedicated to the memory of Dr Valentine Macaulay, whose career – which included time at the ICR – focused on benefitting prostate cancer patients through her pioneering work on IGF-1R. Without her vision and enthusiasm for this project, it would not have been possible.

Image credit: Sangharsh Lohakare on Unsplash (modified)